In this issue
Comments
Book Notes
Masthead

Volume 5, Number 139
15 December 2005

Hope and Light for the Winter Solstice

by Loren Cobb

Dear Friends,

Photo: Alaska Airmen
Where I live, in the snowy mountains of the northern hemisphere, the winter solstice is a time of gathering darkness and freezing temperatures. Arctic blasts of wind deliver ever-deeper piles of snow and ice to our doorsteps, and the weakening sun seems to be losing its battle against the forces of the night. Amid the gloom of winter and appalling headlines in the news, it is hard not to feel that hopes for the future of the human race are darkening as well.

Perhaps it is time for an antidote! Herewith, a warming blast of hope and light delivered to you by The Quaker Economist, just in time to join the season's festivals of lights and song.

Good News on Population

For at least the last forty years we have been subjected to bleak projections of the effects of runaway population growth, including famine and disease in Asia and Africa, catastrophic environmental degradation, and a Malthusian nightmare of war and deadly epidemics. Now the good news: the world's population growth rate peaked in 1969 and has been declining ever since. The critical number to watch, however, is the total fertility rate, defined as the average number of children each woman will have in her lifetime. A world fertility rate under about 2.1 indicates that population will eventually begin to decline.

Total fertility rates all over the world have been in sustained decline, in response to improvements in female education and infant mortality, and to rapid rural-urban migration. In most of the countries of the world it is now below 2.0. It is now probable that the world's population will reach a peak well before 2050, after which it will begin an accelerating decline. I expect news media to run ever more frequent scare headlines about population implosion, but I submit that this will be no disaster at all. Instead it will be a superb development for the environment, for life in our crowded cities, for political stability, for education levels, and for crime in all its forms.

Scare headlines about a greying population unable to take care of its elderly are equally off base, in my opinion. Adjustments that allow for disability while raising the retirement age can cope with this problem, as we are already seeing in Japan.

Good News on Energy

Up until about a decade ago, the world's petroleum industry added more petroleum to its inventory of reserves than it extracted. Now the situation is reversed, energy prices are rising, and the process of switching to alternatives has begun. Natural gas, which causes much less pollution than petroleum, is now the source of most new energy reserves, but it seems extremely unlikely that natural gas can ever fully replace petroleum. The good news, however, is that the energy intensity of the world's economy has been dropping at an annual rate in excess of 1.5% since 1985 (2.1% per year since 1996), during an era of generally flat energy prices. (Energy intensity is defined as total energy consumed per unit of economic activity.)

As efforts to improve industrial and transportation efficiency shift into high gear due to rising energy prices, the rate of improvement in energy intensity will accelerate, to an average of at least 3% per year. At this rate the world's economy can continue indefinitely, despite declining total energy supplies. If energy intensity can improve at 4 or 5% per year — and I think it can — then the result will be a period of perhaps 25 years of ever-increasing efficiency, dropping total energy consumption, rising energy prices, and a progression of alternative energy sources that will likely end in a solar/hydrogen economy. For more details on how this may unfold, see More Profit with Less Carbon, by Amory Lovins.

I realize that the prospect of living through a turbulent and disruptive energy transition terrifies many people, but I see it as, on balance, an overwhelming good. The transition will be extremely good for the environment, good for public health, good for the economy, and good for our sanity. Cities will grow upwards instead of sprawling outwards, telecommuting will become the norm wherever possible, air pollution will fall dramatically, cars will lose two-thirds of their weight, public transportation will come into widespread use, and the production of greenhouse gasses (the probable cause of global warming) will decrease dramatically.

For those who fear that this process will choke off economic and social improvements in the developing world, I suggest taking another look. Countries that are only just now industrializing have the opportunity to build their factories on energy-efficient principles from the start, rather than engaging in costly retrofitting as in the developed world. Dropping energy intensity also implies that they will not need anywhere near as much energy to industrialize as did the developed world in the days of coal and petroleum.

Good News on International Law

Amid the dreadful headlines of explosions and deaths in war, it may be difficult to see the signs of significant progress in international law and government, but those signs are plentiful for anyone who cares to look beneath the surface.

Most people who hear the phrase "world government" think of an executive and a bureaucracy. This is a serious misconception, in my view. Instead, I believe that the proper core of world government is the system of international courts and prosecutors that is now under development. The purpose of these courts is to impose the Rule of Law upon those who, until very recently, have been largely above the law: sovereign states, dictators, war criminals, and multinational corporations.

I anticipate that world government will remain headless — without an executive — deep into the foreseeable future, and I suspect that the world will be better off this way, without a strong executive or an extensive bureaucracy. A system of justice, on the other hand, is absolutely essential. The good news for international politics is that this is precisely what is now appearing on the scene.

  • International investigators from the United Nations are looking into the assassination of Rafik Hariri, a former prime minister of Lebanon. Four generals and a legislator have been indicted and arrested. Just two weeks ago, Syria agreed to allow five government officials to be questioned in Vienna, and more arrests are widely expected.
  • War criminals from the civil war in Yugoslavia continue to be arrested and transported to The Netherlands, for trial at the International Criminal Court. The latest was General Ante Gotovina of Croatia, who was arrested in Spain several days ago.
  • In October, the first arrest warrants were unsealed for five senior leaders of "The Lord's Resistance Army" (LRA) in Uganda. The LRA is alleged to have abducted, murdered, mutilated, and made sex slaves of captured civilians living in displaced-person camps, including children.
  • Investigations are ongoing in the Congo, and in the Darfur region of Sudan, for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Eventually, even recalcitrant countries like the USA and China will realize that there is no substitute for international Rule of Law.

Law that provides for monitoring and certification of free democratic elections lags behind international criminal law, but I think it will catch up over the next ten years or so. At present there is no binding certification process for elections; instead we have an informal system of volunteer election observers provided by the international institutions such as the United Nations and the Organization of American States, and we have private election observers from groups like the Carter Center in Atlanta.

I believe that eventually it will be seen that the cost to the world of defective or fraudulent national elections is so high that they must be prevented by application of international criminal law, working to complement national laws with international oversight and sanctions. I see this as a critical step in improving governance worldwide.

Good News on Corruption

It would be difficult to overstate the impact and importance of the recent work of a tiny private organization, Transparency International, in educating the world about the profoundly deleterious effects of governmental corruption. As recently as five years ago, widespread and systemic corruption was accepted as an unavoidable fact of life in many nations. Now seen as an evil that can and should be fought and brought under better control.

Most citizens of developed nations are completely unaware of their nations' past history of corruption, and of the decades-long battles that were fought to free their governments from this scourge. In my experience, they are equally unaware of just how pervasive and severe systemic corruption is around the world, especially in countries that seem mysteriously entrapped in a perpetual cycle of poverty and political instability. Yet in my view it is precisely systemic corruption which lies at the heart of these vicious cycles, filling governmental offices in nation after nation with cronies, crooks, and incompetents.

The good news is that the word on corruption is getting out, and that opinion leaders around the Third World are aware as never before of the nature of the beast. Positive changes are happening right now, in several dozen countries, and I anticipate a sustained surge of activity in the coming decades.

The ubiquitous spoils system of political appointments is under attack all over the world, which is wonderful but not in itself sufficient. Even more important will be a campaign to clean up judicial systems — courts and prosecutors — which may require international cooperation and assistance. Who can prosecute a corrupt attorney general's office? In the USA this is done with a Special Prosecutor, appointed by the president and responsible to a trusted court. In countries whose entire judiciary is compromised, it may be necessary to fall back upon international special prosecutors, appointed by the president or the Security Council, and responsible to a special-purpose tribunal.

Want More Good News?

It is there if you look for it, hidden underneath the scary headlines and alarming predictions from those who make their living by pandering to fear, pessimism, and depression. The first step of emancipation is to learn to recognize when your emotions are being manipulated for profit. The second step is to take a careful independent look at long-term trends and causal relations, using your own best objective judgment. I think you will like what you see.

The third step, of course, is to read The Quaker Economist. We never shrink from bad news, but neither do we make a profession of adrenaline-pumping alarmist stories. Our goal is to give you measured and accurate analysis, in full context, with the best long-term perspective of which we are capable.

Santayana once said, "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." I love that quote, but I would add one additional idea: "... and those who fail to study the future will be rudely surprised!"

A magnificent yuletide season to everyone,

Loren Cobb


Announcement

The Quaker Economist announces with pride and pleasure the online publication of A History of Wealth and Poverty: Why Some Nations are Rich and Many Poor, by Jack Powelson.

Originally published in 1994 by the University of Michigan Press as Centuries of Economic Endeavor, this new electronic edition is now available to the public at no cost. Click here to see the Table of Contents.

Readers' Comments

Please send comments on this or any TQE, at any time. Selected comments will be appended to the appropriate letter as they are received. Please indicate in the subject line the number of the Letter to which you refer!

Our email address is "tqe-comment" followed by "@quaker.org". All published letters will be edited for spelling, grammar, clarity, and brevity. Please mention your home meeting, church, synagogue (or ...), and where you live.


There's a good deal I agree with and a good deal I disagree with, but let me concentrate on one disagreement. I'm by no means as cheery as you are about world government through courts and prosecutors. Think of the history of independent prosecutors in this country and ask yourself if you want that globalized. As for courts, I think their saving grace — except when they operate in an environment where competition is structured in a healthy way (which is not the case when one side systematically chooses the court) — is that they can on most matters be overruled by legislatures. And I foresee no world legislature coming into being for the foreseeable future that could be expected to behave well.

— Stephen Williams.

Reply: In the "headless" world government that I see forming, there is no executive and no legislature. The place of a normal legislature is taken by the sovereign states of the world. Their multilateral treaties have the effect of law, as though passed by a legislature, but with applicability only to signatories of each treaty.

I am certainly not trying to say that this is a perfect system. However, I do think that it is better than the alternative in which inter-state conflicts are settled by warfare rather than treaties, and certain individuals and organizations are effectively above any law. — Loren


I sincerely pray that your Hope and Light for the Winter Solstice prevails. If we are able to purge our own government of the many corrupting forces and influences which seem to be prevalent I will have considerably more optimism than I have right now. In any case, I wish you all a wonderful holiday season (Christmas, the beginning of Chanukah and Kwanza all fall within the same two days this year. Is that a first?) and a most wonderful year to come.

— Janet Minshall.


Thanks again for a stimulating TQE! The innovation of including one or more hyperlinks as needed is most welcome. I tried to check on your population assurances and Google led me to a UN Population Program haystack. I’m sure there is useful information in there somewhere, but the best I could do was from 1995 with low projection of 7 billion people topped out by 2050, or 9 to 11 billion and growing on alternative projections. So help us with hyperlinks where you can!

I can do with all the optimism you have to spare, but I am a bit suspicious of these rate arguments. You know that Bush wants us to focus on lowering the rate of increase of the rate of fossil fuel emissions. (i.e. We should adopt a target that itself implies continued growth of fossil fuel emissions.)

What do the absolute numbers for population, World GDP, atmospheric CO2 (and other greenhouse gasses) and temperature change look like for 2050? It is comforting to know that a way out exists (if it is not already too late). But if the atmosphere continues to be an open access resource into which nations can dump their waste CO2 at no cost, how long will it take for the Rocky Mountain Institute technologies to get traction? I am more persuaded by Jared Diamand's Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed.

I would welcome TQE revisiting this topic from time to time. There is much public policy that supports increased global warming, that deserves deconstructing by TQE.

— Wilfred Candler, Annapolis Friends Meeting (MD).

Reply: I have revised this TQE so that the first chart (on population trends) now includes the actual data table, the data source (with link), and also a link to an excellent AAAS website on population and the environment, published in 2001. In the AAAS site, you will see three population projections. Developments since 2001 suggest that our actual population trajectory will be at or below the lowest of these curves, implying a peak population of 7.5 billion in 2040 or so.

Demographers have been consistently underestimating the decline in total fertility for years, then having to correct their projections downwards.

As yet another example of this, the US Census in 2002 projected a world population of 9.2 billion in 2050, still growing at 0.45% per year. Their projection is based on a slow decline in total fertility down to 2.0 in 2050. But their projected fertility for 2005 is already too high (2.6 instead of 2.5)! I think that total fertility will decline to 2.0 by 2025 at the latest, and will keep on descending to about 1.5 by 2050. That is the basis for my TQE statements.

There are several reasons why all published population projections are too pessimistic. First, China and India continue to make much better progress than expected, on all fronts. Second, rural-urban migration continues to dwarf expectations. These two factors explain almost all the error in past projections. Both factors will, I believe, continue into the future. — Loren


Thanks for the good news. But in this day and age of maniacal attention to political correctness, I find it interesting that you focus on the solstice rather than on Christmas. Just an observation from a libertarian-leaning Christocentric Quaker... In the Light,

— Charles Rathmann.

Reply: I feel constrained to point out that in prior centuries many Friends refused to celebrate Christmas with presents, festivities, Santa Claus, lights and decorated trees, etc. Instead, these Friends preferred the inward quest, in quiet serenity. That is a long way from political correctness, then or now. I share these sentiments — I refuse to associate the solstice with the birth of Jesus — but I am happy to join in with the solstice festivals of light and good cheer in full knowledge that their roots are more ancient than any form of Christianity. — Loren


Good news is always pleasant! One small note concerning this statement: "The first step of emancipation is to learn to recognize when your emotions are being manipulated for profit." Gain would be a better term than profit, which usually refers to money. Profit is a subset of gain, and gain conveys power. We should be concerned about the creation of power, its distribution, its uses and responses to it. Non-profit organizations exist to obtain power, just like profit-making enterprises. Each has governance problems, and the merits of the outcomes achieved by each are complex and hotly disputed.

On a related plain, Kenneth Boulding offered some wisdom when discussing how Quakers lost control of the Pennsylvania legislature in the 1740s for failing to send a militia to the western frontier to deal with the Indians. He said that Quakers lost power to gain influence. I believe that this is the safer course, consistent with humility and nonviolence.

— J.D. Von Pischke, a Friend from Reston, VA.


I recently discovered The Quaker Economist and your other articles posted online. I'm not a Quaker, but went to Earlham College and feel a strong affinity. Can you recommend what you think may be the best biography of Gandhi? I was fascinated with your comments about him in the article A Quaker in the Military. Thank you for presenting to Quakers a more balanced view on some issues than many otherwise might not get!

— Martha Bowes.

Editor's Reply: This is a difficult question to answer well, because Gandhi is one of those people in whom people see what they want to see. His most famous biography is by Erik Erikson, a psychoanalyst. This book, entitled Gandhi's Truth, gives one man's interpretation of Gandhi. It's very insightful and well-written, but it is far from the whole story. A different picture emerges from Gandhi's own autobiography, The Story of My Experiments with the Truth — but that picture is the one that Gandhi himself wanted to project. I learned the most from two books that are not biographical. One is The Gandhi Reader, a selection of his essays and speeches. The other is a small and inexpensive book entitled Gandhi on Non-Violence, by Thomas Merton. Of all the books on Gandhi, I like Merton's the best. — Loren

Merton, Thomas. Gandhi on Non-Violence: A Selection from the Writings of Mahatma Gandhi. New York: New Directions Publishing, 1964.

Fred Baldwin replies: I can recommend George Orwell's short essay, "Reflections on Gandhi," written in 1949, not long after Gandhi's assassination. It appears — along with "Politics and the English Language" — in In Front of Your Nose, the fourth volume of a collection of Orwell's essays and letters.

Orwell did not find Gandhi especially likeable, but he did consider him honest and generally admirable. Orwell has some sharp things to say about pacifism. I admire Orwell greatly, but he (as Loren Cobb says of Gandhi) is "one of those people in whom people see what they want to see."

— Fred D. Baldwin, Carlisle (PA) Friends Meeting. [January, 2006]


I appreciated your favorable picture on the future of energy. It confirms my belief that we don't really need any fancy national energy policy but need to trust in a free market system for energy. Subsidies for fossil fuels should be gradually eliminated and we should let energy prices gradually rise to reflect their true cost and value. This would probably do more to promote alternative energy sources than anything. Some type of purchase subsidy might be in order for the truly needy. In friendship,

— Joseph Mills, Kalamazoo Friends Meeting.


I too look with optimism that someday international law will be honored. But the US courts will not acknowledge that under our constitution, all treaties and conventions are the law of our land. Often they barely even acknowledge our constitution. Witness the many issues in today's America involving detainee torture, unending detention without trial or charges, extraordinary rendition, waving of rights to privacy and secret wire-taps, etc. Our country is not headed in the optimistic direction you seek, except perhaps as a massive reversing swing back to democratic principles and away from autocracy.

I look forward to international law being applied to our current resident of the White House and a large number of his partners in war crimes in and around the Potomac. Their orchestrated killing of 100,000 + Iraqis and who knows how many Afghans in the name of the "war on terror" makes it shameful to call oneself an American.

I met a counter-protestor who was carrying a sign that read Viva Bush on the streets of Denver recently, when King Bush was in town. I said to him, "I do agree that Bush should live, but only if behind bars for he is a war criminal who has trashed not only our constitution but international law." [...] He said to me that the USA can enforce its will anywhere anytime, and that it is not bound by any international treaty, or by any other nation. That is the force of shallow selfish thinking that must be overcome. I want to be an optimist, but...

— Rich Andrews, Boulder (CO) Friends Meeting.

Reply: Perhaps I failed to make it sufficiently clear that this essay is focused on the world in general, not the USA. In that context, the progress is unmistakable and very significant, even without participation by the USA.

It is worth pointing out that American exceptionalism — especially with respect to international law — is nothing new. It has been around for a couple of hundred years, but I believe it too will inevitably fall to the forces of globalization, and indeed sooner rather than later. It is my hope that the Bush II presidency will mark the beginning of the end of attempts to place the USA above and beyond the reach of international law. — Loren


Thanks for the Christmas gift! I knew there was some good on the horizon somewhere. I like the one about factories in developing countries using the latest in energy efficient technologies. And with rising fuel prices they have even more reason to do this. I think the economists who predict that the market will correct global warming may be on to something.

Blessings for a warm holiday.

— Rich Ailes, Middletown Meeting, Lima, PA.


Magnificent and inspiring! Thank you so for pointing out what is so obvious to me. The world for humankind is today the most wonderful world that humankind has ever known, and this condition is likely to continue to improve in the forseeable future.

As a side note, I suspect that rapidly declining fertility rates are more directly correlated to rising per capita incomes than to specific levels of female education or levels of infant mortality. I support the theory that it is underlying per capita income growth that drives educational achievement, reduces infant mortality, and lowers fertility rates. (Unrepentent capitalist that I am) And as world incomes are projected to continue rising everywhere except the dungeon known as North Korea, your rosy predictions are even more likely to become reality.

Thank you for the spirit of christmas, in the spirit of Christ.

— Christopher Viavant, Director, Utah Health Choice Network.


Book Notes

Registered readers of TQE are cordially invited to send us notes on books they have read. Please send us the book's title, the author, the publisher, and a single informative paragraph about the book. All notes will be edited for spelling, grammar, clarity, and brevity. Send to: cobb@Aetheling.com


Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic, by James Gilligan, MD. New York: Vintage Books, 1996.

This is a must-read book. It presents the best analysis of violence in modern society that I have ever read — and I have read a lot of them. Gilligan is a psychiatrist who works with the most violent people in America, long-term prisoners convicted of multiple acts of murder, rape, and aggravated assault. He finds that these prisoners have experienced levels of domestic violence so far out of the ordinary as to beggar the imagination, and he finds almost every one to be ready at a moment's notice to kill or commit suicide rather than to suffer a loss of self-respect. This is sociopathy and narcissism at their violent worst, revealed and dissected by a master of human psychology. To top it off, he shows how our current justice system exacerbates the problem, making it worse at every turn. Read this book, please!Contributed by Loren Cobb.


Masthead

Publisher: Russ Nelson, St. Lawrence Valley (NY) Friends Meeting.

Editor: Loren Cobb, Boulder (CO) Friends Meeting.

Editorial Board

  • Chuck Fager, Director, Quaker House, Fayetteville, NC.
  • Virginia Flagg, San Diego (CA) Friends Meeting.
  • Valerie Ireland, Boulder (CO) Friends Meeting.
  • Jack Powelson, Boulder (CO) Meeting of Friends.
  • Norval Reece, Newtown (PA) Friends Meeting.
  • William G. Rhoads, Germantown (PA) Monthly Meeting.
  • J.D. von Pischke, a Friend from Reston, VA.
  • John Spears, Princeton (NJ) Friends Meeting.
  • Geoffrey Williams, Attender at New York Fifteenth Street Meeting.

Members of the Editorial Board do not necessarily endorse the contents of any issue of The Quaker Economist.

Letters to the Editor

Please write to "tqe-comment" followed by "@quaker.org" to comment on this or any TQE Letter. Use as Subject the number of the Letter to which you refer. Permission to publish your comment is presumed unless you say otherwise. Please keep it short, preferably under 100 words. All published letters will be edited for spelling, grammar, clarity, and brevity. Please mention your home meeting, church, synagogue (or ...), and where you live.

Subscriptions

To subscribe or unsubscribe, at no cost, visit our Home Page.

Each essay in The Quaker Economist is copyright by its author. However, you have permission to forward it to your friends and invite them to subscribe at no cost. Please mention our website as you do so, and tell your recipient how to find us (tqe.quaker.org).

The purpose of The Quaker Economist is to combine Quaker values and concern for the poor and oppressed with the best of hard-headed economics and social science.

Copyright © 2005 by Loren Cobb. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted for non-commercial reproduction.
Students take note: copying any part of this essay into your written work without attribution is plagiarism.

Previous Letter | Home Page | Next Letter